Link

This is an intelligent, clear-sighted article. It’s one of the few I’ve read that discusses cultural difference in a value-neutral way, pulling shit apart without falling into the traps of useless generalisation, essentialising, political correctness, or hysteria. There’s definitely an awareness of cultural capital, the significance of community as a value (and as something that drives values), and the problematics of assimilation.

“If it is true that they are collectively dominating in elite high schools and universities, is it also true that Asian-Americans are dominating in the real world? My strong suspicion was that this was not so, and that the reasons would not be hard to find. If we are a collective juggernaut that inspires such awe and fear, why does it seem that so many Asians are so readily perceived to be, as I myself have felt most of my life, the products of a timid culture, easily pushed around by more assertive people, and thus basically invisible?

The failure of Asian-Americans to become leaders in the white-collar workplace does not qualify as one of the burning social issues of our time. But it is a part of the bitter undercurrent of Asian-American life that so many Asian graduates of elite universities find that meritocracy as they have understood it comes to an abrupt end after graduation.”

Photo
aeide-thea (♥!):

gyzym:

Okay, what the hell, no. No. No. No. No.
So here’s the deal—I’m sure that this has been true for people. I’d go ahead and bet it was true for whoever made the graphic, and you know what, if that person had used “I” instead of “a woman” I would be just fine with this. If, for her, for anyone, the act of getting a haircut is a “clear gesture of defiance, dissatisfaction or despair,” that’s fine for them.
However, the idea that all women and the choices that they make about their bodies are reflecting this same emotional concept? That, incidentally, revolves around men? Yeah, no. Fuck that very much. No.
When I was in high school I cut 8 inches off my hair on a whim one day because I woke up and it felt heavy; I started growing it out when I left college because someone tried to tell me that “grown women keep their hair cropped.” It’s been blonde and..er, well, darker blonde, red for that one season, maroon, briefly, once, and I don’t make the decisions about what color I put in it based on how men feel either. It’s what looks good to me and what doesn’t. It’s what feels right and what doesn’t. It’s what I want or don’t want, because it is part of my body, and I am the only person who has the right to make a decision about it.
So, from where I’m standing, this should really read:
When a woman cuts her hair off, it’s not really about men at all, no matter what anyone says. Women know their own bodies better than anyone else does, and so when they cut their hair off, they are effectively making a decision that no one else has any right to judge. Whatever their reason, it’s a clear gesture of whatever they want it to be—whether it’s defiance, despair, dissatisfaction, or just that they’ve decided they want shorter fucking hair.
Don’t let anyone tell you the right way to be a girl—to be a person—ever. However you’re doing it is just exactly the way it’s supposed to be done. 

reblogged for commentary.



YES.

I’m probably going to have to cut my hair soon, I might even lose all of it, because one of the medications I take for my rheumatoid arthritis is making it fall out, and about three-quarters of it is gone. Do you why methotrexate hair loss is hard? It’s not just the knowledge that you’re poisoning your body, or the fact that it’s a reminder, a physical marker of the losses you have to endure because of illness. It’s because of the shitty, violent aesthetics — expressed in images like this one — which surround and oppress women’s bodies, teaching them to internalise shit like, you have to titillate the male gaze to have worth, you have to be beautiful, you have to be sexy, and you have to do it in the ways we tell you to. According to these aesthetics, women must have hair. If they don’t, out come the judgments, the assumptions. And so a medication side effect that might just be a nuisance, if I were male, is going to cause me grief. Not to mention cause me to hate myself a little for not being strong enough, for being unable to just say fuck it and not care what people think. So — seriously, fuck this image, fuck this attitude.

aeide-thea (♥!):

gyzym:

Okay, what the hell, no. No. No. No. No.

So here’s the deal—I’m sure that this has been true for people. I’d go ahead and bet it was true for whoever made the graphic, and you know what, if that person had used “I” instead of “a woman” I would be just fine with this. If, for her, for anyone, the act of getting a haircut is a “clear gesture of defiance, dissatisfaction or despair,” that’s fine for them.

However, the idea that all women and the choices that they make about their bodies are reflecting this same emotional concept? That, incidentally, revolves around men? Yeah, no. Fuck that very much. No.

When I was in high school I cut 8 inches off my hair on a whim one day because I woke up and it felt heavy; I started growing it out when I left college because someone tried to tell me that “grown women keep their hair cropped.” It’s been blonde and..er, well, darker blonde, red for that one season, maroon, briefly, once, and I don’t make the decisions about what color I put in it based on how men feel either. It’s what looks good to me and what doesn’t. It’s what feels right and what doesn’t. It’s what I want or don’t want, because it is part of my body, and I am the only person who has the right to make a decision about it.

So, from where I’m standing, this should really read:

When a woman cuts her hair off, it’s not really about men at all, no matter what anyone says. Women know their own bodies better than anyone else does, and so when they cut their hair off, they are effectively making a decision that no one else has any right to judge. Whatever their reason, it’s a clear gesture of whatever they want it to be—whether it’s defiance, despair, dissatisfaction, or just that they’ve decided they want shorter fucking hair.

Don’t let anyone tell you the right way to be a girl—to be a person—ever. However you’re doing it is just exactly the way it’s supposed to be done. 

reblogged for commentary.

YES. I’m probably going to have to cut my hair soon, I might even lose all of it, because one of the medications I take for my rheumatoid arthritis is making it fall out, and about three-quarters of it is gone. Do you why methotrexate hair loss is hard? It’s not just the knowledge that you’re poisoning your body, or the fact that it’s a reminder, a physical marker of the losses you have to endure because of illness. It’s because of the shitty, violent aesthetics — expressed in images like this one — which surround and oppress women’s bodies, teaching them to internalise shit like, you have to titillate the male gaze to have worth, you have to be beautiful, you have to be sexy, and you have to do it in the ways we tell you to. According to these aesthetics, women must have hair. If they don’t, out come the judgments, the assumptions. And so a medication side effect that might just be a nuisance, if I were male, is going to cause me grief. Not to mention cause me to hate myself a little for not being strong enough, for being unable to just say fuck it and not care what people think. So — seriously, fuck this image, fuck this attitude.

(Source: uncomfortablesoul)

Tags: peopleism
Link

The best break-up post I have ever read.

Link
Tags: peopleism
Link

Other good articles on the defunding of Planned Parenthood, and the issues surrounding it, here, here, here, here, and here.

Tags: peopleism
Link

“Jasika Nicole, 28, an F.B.I. agent on “Fringe,” a new Fox drama, said that as bigger parts became available, her manager, John Essay, sat her down and asked how public she wanted to be about being a lesbian. Some roles could be lost, he told her, as would some fans.

Mr. Essay, who is gay, said he encouraged openness but warned clients of the risks.

“If it becomes exaggerated,” he said, “you just become the gay actress instead of a wonderful actress.”

Perhaps, he suggested, she didn’t want to be too vocal about it.

Ms. Nicole, who has a girlfriend, said she would just be herself. She has been open about her sexual orientation since she started dating women about 3 ½ years ago, while she was filming “Take the Lead” with Antonio Banderas in Toronto.

Now, as she becomes better known, “There’s no way I can keep quiet,” she said. “I want to be clear this is my partner. I don’t want to make that shameful in any kind of way.””

Tags: peopleism
Link

“As Cordelia Fine documents in Delusions of Gender, researchers change their focus, technology marches on, but sexism is eternal. Its latest incarnation is what she calls “neurosexism”, sexist bias disguised in the “neuroscientific finery” of claims about neurons, brains, hormones.”

I’d love to read this book.

Link

notes to self:
- hierarchy is based in (false) valuation! Saussure etc.
- the tendency to focus on what should be/false values instead of on the complexities of what is.

Link

AHAHAHAHA. I love when you don’t even have to comment and an article is so bad it satirises itself. this is fucking hilarious.

Tags: peopleism
Link

The findings suggest that being male or female is not a permanently fixed state but something that has to be continually maintained in the adult body by the constant interaction of genes to keep the status quo – and the gender war – from slipping in favour of the opposite sex.

Link
Tags: peopleism
Link

sometimes this world makes me want to puke. fuck gender, fuck sexuality. why don’t you just take a good, long look at the person standing in front of you? (entangled in/overshadowed by the all of the depersonalising categories-for-objects that modern civilisation has cleverly invented.)

Link
Tags: peopleism
Quote
"If you scratch down just below the surface, you’ll find this kind of Othering in all “good stereotypes.” The well-worn trope about black men being strong and athletic with huge dicks is supposed to be some kind of compliment, even as it directly recalls the myth of violent, animalistic black male sexuality to which so much of America’s long history of racist terrorism has been a response. The “positive stereotype” of the smart Asian is based on the old idea of Asian folks as crafty, untrustworthy possessors of secret knowledge — an idea whose assumed validity makes it easier to round folks up en masse during wartime and shove them into detention camps."

— via racialicious

Tags: peopleism